Volume Two, Issue Four
11/98
Volume Two, Issue Four
"DECEPTION IN THE CHURCH" Newsletter
11/98
Dear All,
The feature article of this issue is by Barbara Wilhelm. It is
a clear call to discernment for all Christians in these times of false
doctrines being introduced secretly into the Church.
2 Peter 2:1 "But there were also false prophets among the
people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will
secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign
Lord who bought them--bringing swift destruction on
themselves."
Lule 12:1 " ... Be on your guard against the yeast of the
Pharisees, which is hypocrisy."
Galations 5:9 "A little yeast works through the whole batch
of dough."
As always, if you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, simply
drop me an e-mail and you will be immediately removed.
The reverse applies if you want to be added or know someone who would
benefit from the articles we feature in this
newsletter.
In His hands,
DITC
IF IT LOOKS SO GOOD, HOW CAN IT BE DECEPTION?
By Barb Wilhelm
"Now the serpent was more subtle and crafty
than any creature of the field which God had made" (Gen 3:1) (Amplified
version).
"But also (in those days) there arose false
prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among
your-selves, who will subtly and stealthily introduce heretical doctrines.."
( 2 Pe 2:1).
"For certain men have crept in stealthily - gaining entrance secretly by a side door" (Jude 4).
How often do we hear the refrain - if it looks so "good" ("brings forth
such "good fruit"), how can it be deception? Are we
expecting deception to be obvious? Why then would the Bible describe
it as "more subtle and crafty, stealthily" gaining entrance
as by a side door? Barnes Commentary states in the analysis of 2 Pe
2:1 that
"...(false teachers) would not at first make
an open avowal of their doctrines, but would, in fact, while their teachings
seemed
to be in accordance with truth, secretly maintain opinions which would
sap the very foundations of religion. The Greek words
used in the preceding verses means properly to lead in along with others.
Nothing could better express the usual way in which
error is introduced. It is by the side, or along with, other doctrines
which are true; that is, while the mind is turned mainly to
other subjects, and is off its guard, gently and silently to lay down
some principle, which, being admitted, would lead to error.
Those who preach error rarely do it openly."
THEREFORE, WE SHOULD EXPECT DECEPTION TO LOOK "GOOD"!! According to
the Bible, the easiest method of
deception is for error to ride on the back of truth. We hear what is,
indeed, truth being preached. We assume that everything,
therefore, being preached is truth, that everything being done is Biblical,
so we let down our guard...and error and deception
can then enter "secretly by the side door." Do we forget that it is
a little bit of leaven that leavens the whole loaf?
Let's carefully examine what the Bible says about things that look "good." A few simple - yet startling - examples:
Gen 13:10 - What did God describe as looking
"like the Garden of the Lord"? SODOM (where exceedingly great sinners
lived, v.13)
Ezek 28:12- Who did God say was "the full measure
and pattern of exactness - full of wisdom and PERFECT IN
BEAUTY"? SATAN
Mt 7: 15 - Who will come "dressed as sheep"
on the outside, "but inside are devouring wolves"? False prophets...looking
"good."
Acts 20:29-30 also speaks of "ferocious wolves" that come from "inside", from those thought to be in the flock of Christ.
Mt 23:12 - Who "looked beautiful on the outside"?
The Pharisees who "inside are full of dead men's bones and everything
impure."
2 Cor 11: 14,15 - Who will come as an "angel of light" and as "ministers of righteousness"? Satan and his servants.
Conclusion: deception looks "good" on the outside, but inside it is deadly.
It requires diligence to discern when Satan comes as an "angel of light",
bringing what looks like the "light" of new revelation on
a holy subject: when he comes, not as a devil, but as "another Jesus";
not with out-and- out heresy, but with "another Gospel";
and when he does all this in a religious setting, as "another spirit"
(2 Cor 11:4). Have we forgotten that Satan is a "religious"
creature? Have we not realized that false gospels are not completely
new gospels, rather they are true gospels with a few
"minor" changes? Didn't the Galatians believe the basic truths of Christianity?
Yet, Paul said, not once but twice, that they were
to be "accursed"(Gal 1:8-9) for receiving a "different gospel," for
making a few changes to the true gospel.
Perhaps, we need to look at some passages of Scripture in greater detail
so that we may grow in discernment and avoid the
deadly dangers of deception. Let's start at the beginning...
Genesis 3 contains the foundational truths of discerning deception.
The Garden of Eden was a perfect religious setting; and into
this perfect religious setting came deception. The relationship between
God and the man and woman was so close that He
"walked in the garden in the cool of the day" with them. This was spiritual
intimacy of the highest order. And therein was part of
Satan's subtle deception - he tempted the woman in the realm of that
spiritual intimacy to become closer to God, to be more
like Him (v.5). Let's remember that deception came before the Fall,
before sin corrupted her mind with the twisted knowledge
of what good and evil were. Exactly because of the purity of her being,
this deception had to come in a very "good" disguise -
so it came disguised in a holy desire for her to be closer to the God
she loved. Such a holy desire - but, in order for it to be
fulfilled she had to disobey His one "small" warning: just take one
bite of what looked "good" to her. Here was the first
appearance of the "angel of light", bringing new "light" in a "holy"
way. And she did eat...and Adam did likewise. And they lost
everything. The temptation looked "good"; it sounded "holy"; and it
would allow them to grow "wise" - how could this be bad
when it looked so good?
In their deception and sin, the man and woman did not even first realize
there was any change in them: "After Eve had eaten and
apparently suffered no ill effect, this constituted an additional argument
why Adam need not hesitate to adopt the same course"
(Barnes Commentary). After all, she hadn't died as God said she would
if she ate of the fruit, so it must be safe. But, "they eat,
they expect marvelous results, they wait and there grows on them a
sense of shame" (ibid). When we are first deceived, we
may still seem to be holy - perhaps we may even think we are more holy
- but in time a sense of shame will grow on us. We
have partaken of that which God has forbidden in His Word: we have
fallen for that which we think looks "good."
In the Garden of Eden, wasn't one of the things the Lord was saying
was that He had already given the man and woman ALL
they need? They did not need more than all the trees and fruits He
had already provided for them. Today, isn't He trying to tell
us the same thing? He has given us salvation and the baptism of the
Holy Spirit - there is no "more" described in the Bible. Then
why is the cry across the land for "more, Lord, more"? Biblically,
what "more" is there? Do we not already have all we need?
Then there is the parable of the wheat and the tares in Mt 13:24-30. Unger's Bible Dictionary defines tares as:
a poisonous grass almost indistinguishable
from wheat while the two are growing into blade, at the beginning. When
they
come into ear, they can be separated without difficulty.
At the beginning all the crop "looks good", according to what the eye
can see. But as time goes on the tares become visible.
The wheat is sown first by the Lord. Then the enemy sows his tares
as men sleep. Isn't this another way of saying that first, the
true gospel may be preached, but "alongside" of that tares are sown?
(remember 2 Pe 2) The Matthew Henry Commentary
states:
...when reason and conscience sleep, and people
are off their guard then the enemy comes in...Note, when Satan is doing
the greatest mischief, he studies most to conceal himself; for his
design is in danger of being spoiled if he be seen in it; and
therefore when he comes to sow tares, he transforms himself into an
angel of light (2 Cor 11:13,14)...The tares appeared not
until the blade sprung up and brought forth fruit,v.26. As the good
seed, so the tares lie a great while under the soil, and at first
springing up, it is hard to distinguish them..."
All revivals may look good: great enthusiasm and devotion may be displayed.
But, religious enthusiasm in itself is not evidence
of the truth. The Pharisees had great religious enthusiasm, so do Catholic
mystics and Mormon missionaries. Yet, remember Mt
7: 21-23:
Not every one who says to Me, Lord, Lord will
enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father Who
is in heaven. Many will say to Me on that day, Lord, Lord, have we
not prophesied in YOUR NAME, and driven out demons
in Your Name, and done many mighty miracles in YOUR NAME? And then
I will say to them openly, Depart from Me, I
never knew you.
Who were in danger: just a few? No, many. Were evil acts being performed?
No, they were doing miracles, great signs and
wonders, prophesying. Were they done in a demon's name? No, in JESUS'
NAME! In His Holy Name. Yet, He said - depart
from Me. How "good" it all looks and sounds - in our eyes. Not in His.
Moses was a true man of God, working true miracles. Yet, in the beginning,
his miracles were duplicated by Pharaoh's
magicians (Ex 7:11-12, 22; 8:7). So that we do not forget how prone
we always are to "signs-and-wonders" deceptions, 2 Ti
2: 5-9 makes references to these magicians, Jannes and Jambres by name.
It warns against "silly" (v.6) people who are "forever
inquiring and getting information, but are never able to arrive at
a knowledge of the Truth"(v.7). Verse 9 promises that these
counterfeits will eventually be exposed. But, in the meantime, they
will continue performing signs and wonders, counterfeit signs
and wonders.
Counterfeits, in the real world, are only successful in so far as they,
as closely as possible, imitate the real. Only very close
scrutiny will show that that $100 bill is not legal tender. In the
real world, if a warning went forth that there were counterfeiters
at large, wouldn't we scrutinize our money with great diligence? Yet,
there are "spiritual counterfeits" at large and so many are
gullibly accepting what they teach at face value. There is so much
more at stake - our spiritual lives hang in the balance.
The whole chapter of Deut 13 is a warning about deception, but perhaps the most alarming verses are 1-3:
If a prophet arises among you and gives you
a sign or wonder and the sign or wonder he foretells to you COMES TO
PASS, and if he says, Let us go after other gods, which you have not
known, and let us serve them. You shall not listen to the
words of that prophet; for the Lord your God is testing you to know
whether you love the Lord your God with all your mind
and heart and with your entire being.
Note: the man called himself a prophet of God. He came from among them,
like the tares are among the wheat, like error
comes alongside truth. And, incredibly, what he said CAME TO PASS!
IT LOOKED GOOD!! Yet, God says not to listen to
him; on the contrary, v.8 says that that prophet is to be put to death
for talking rebellion.
The Lord says all this deception is sent as a test to know whether we
love Him totally. Interestingly, the remedy for deception is
for us to do our own "testing." In 1 Th 5: 21 we are commanded by God
to "prove all things until you can recognize what is
good; to that hold fast." The word prove in scripture is a metallurgist's
term. It is referred to in Jer 6: 27-30. An assayer or
prover is to test ore closely because fool's gold looks so much like
real gold ( it "looks good.") Once the assayer tests the ore
and discovers it is gold, he then tests it further to see how pure
that gold is - 10k, 12k, 24k, Interesting isn't it: God tests us to
see if we are gold and how pure gold we are, and we are to test all
things to see if they are gold and how pure they are. In Acts
17: 11 the Bereans were commended as being "more noble" because they
took the Scriptures so seriously that they even tested
the teachings of Paul. Notice that they did not use the fluctuating
criteria of emotions or experiences in their testing; they used
the only one reliable, trustworthy, infallible standard - the Word
of God. Isa 8:20 commands "Direct people to the teaching and
the testimony; if their teachings are not in accord with this word,
it is because there is no light in them.
Where is the purest gold found? in the City of God (Rev 21:21). We are
only fit for this Golden City as we, too, are purified
and immerse ourselves in pure teaching. In Jn 17:17 Jesus Himself said:
"Sanctify them by the Truth. THY WORD is truth."
Not our emotions, not our experiences, not by how "good" it looks or
sounds or feels...by THY WORD.
I will close this by two simple examples of testing popular teachings by the holy standard of the Bible:
How many times have we heard that the end-times
will be marked by revival? Yet, revival is NOT the sign of the end-times.
DECEPTION is the sign of the end times. So says Jesus in Mt 24 in v.
4, 5, 11, 23, 24. So says Paul in 2 Th 2:3.
How often have we been hearing lately about
"miraculous signs and wonders"? The problem is that whenever signs and
wonders are mentioned in the Bible in relation to the end times, they
are called LYING signs and wonders! So says Jesus in Mt
24:24 and Paul in 2 Th 2: 9 ( see also 2 Pe 2). Jesus in fact warns
strongly against signs and wonders in Mt 12:39 and 16:4
--"An evil and adulterous generation seeks a sign; but no sign shall
be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah." Then
why are so many today being applauded for the "signs and wonders" in
their midst?
Modern Day Application
There is a movement occurring today that, sadly, illustrates the principle
herein described: error comes in alongside truth. I am
speaking of the "Pensacola Revival" at Brownsville Assembly of God
Church. I have personally viewed video tapes of
numerous Brownsville services and read countless articles from Biblical
authorities on their observations regarding the
"Pensacola Revival." The Word that is preached may be holy. The burden
for the lost and the heart's desire for the flock may
be real. Individuals' lives may have changed for the better because
of a sincere desire for God. BUT are the "impartations", the
"birthings", the physical manifestations and emotional excesses truly
of God? Are they not, instead, errors that have come
alongside truth and are not those "little bits of leaven" in terrible
danger of leavening the whole loaf?
We cannot test what we see and hear by our emotions or by experience:
the only remedy for deception is the truth, the
objective truth of God's Word. We must discern what is light and what
is darkness. We must test the origins of this revival, its
teachings and its total conformity to Scripture. Only by testing can
we know what is true and to be embraced and what is
deception and to be avoided.
Our criteria for truth, therefore, is not if it looks, sounds or feels
"good." Partaking of the tree of the knowledge of GOOD and
evil was our first sin - thinking we knew what was "good". The remedy
for that sin in the Garden of Eden was "Yes, God
HATH said!" Today, the remedy is still the same - has God said in His
Word that it is good. Let our prayer be that in Isa 11:
2-3:
"(That) the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon
( us), the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and
might, the
spirit of knowledge and of the reverential and obedient fear of he
Lord. And make us of quick understanding, and (let our)
delight be in the reverential and obedient fear of the Lord. And (let
us) NOT judge by the sight of (our eyes) neither decide by
the hearing of (our) ears"...Nor by how "good" it looks or sounds or
feels. Amen." (Amplified Version).
Barbara Wilhelm - 11/97