þ A Profile Of The Word-Faith Movement Positive Confession and the Word Faith Movement -Compiled by Clete Hux Positive Confession is the belief that if a believer speaks "spiritual" or "faith-filled" words then he can have what he says. Unfortunately, this influence has invaded the church and continues to cause much turmoil and confusion. Many of the teachers of this movement believe that words are so powerful that they can influence the physical and spiritual worlds. For example: In "The Tongue, a Creative Force" (1976), positive confessionist Charles Capps, teaches that there are powerful "spiritual words." Such words, which are ordinary words, can under certain circumstances, become vehicles for creative or supernatural power. When faith-filled spiritual words are spoken (as words of power), they can alter the physical and spiritual world. Capps says, "You see there is more to it than just saying it. The words must originate from the inner man where spiritual power is released through words." He goes on to state that "spirit words can control both the spirit world and the physical world. Because the words themselves have power, they will work for either God or man in the same manner." He goes on: "The spirit of man is not of this world, it is of the spirit world. The creative ability of man comes through his spirit... He speaks spirit words that work in the world of the spirit. They will also dominate the physical world. He breathes spirit life into God's Word and it becomes a living substance, working for him as it worked for God in the beginning. These spirit words dominate the natural world." (p.117-118). What Capps is alluding to in the above statement is his teaching that since God, "by His faith" (using words) spoke this physical world into existence - the believer, using faith, can do the same. That is, the believer can speak things into existence. However, God's word is already "quick and powerful" {Hebrews 4:12}and it is referred to as the "Word of Life" {Phillipians 2:16}. It is not necessary to activate it by speaking words of faith as though it were asleep or dead! Rather, it is by hearing the "living" word that one is brought to salvation through faith in Christ.{Romans 10:17}. A number of the prosperity teachers believe that the spiritual world controls and continually forms the physical world. So, if one can learn to control the spiritual world, then he can learn to control the physical world as well. This teaching then becomes the foundation for securing individual prosperity. That's why in "Releasing the Ability of God," Capps states, "You can have what you say!... (because) the powerful force of the spiritual world that creates the circumstances around us is controlled by the words of the mouth. This force comes from inside us... the confession of our mouth will cause you to possess it. (pp.98-99, parenthesis mine). This is why he teaches, "Discipline your vocabulary," and "today your word is god over your circumstances." (pp.101-104). Capps also teaches that the power within a Christian, within one's spirit, functions according to unchangeable laws. He says "These principles of faith are based on spiritual laws. They work for whosoever will apply these laws." (The Tongue, p.103) D.R. McConnell, in his book, "A Different Gospel," directly traces the origin the spiritual laws taught in positive confession to the metaphysics of E.W. Kenyon, a man of 50-60 years ago whose theology was that of Pentecostal Christian Science.( A Different Gospel, pp. 3-56). McConnell records Kenneth Copeland in "The Laws of Prosperity," ( p.98, 101), saying, "You can have what you say! In fact, what you are saying is exactly what you are getting now. If you are living in poverty and lack and want, change what you are saying. It will change what you have... Discipline your vocabulary... God will be obligated to meet your needs because of His word... If you stand firmly on this, your needs will be met." (Ibid, p.173). McConnell further states, that E.W. Kenyon's New Thought classmate, Ralph Waldo Trine, attributes the confession of prosperity to "occult power." He says that "Trine believed that thought is a force, and it has occult power of unknown proportions when rightly used and wisely directed." (Ibid, p.174). The usage of occult powers is, of course, a practice that the Faith teachers would publicly reject. And of course, this is not to say that those offering these teachings are occultists. They are teachers who may never have thought through the implications of the practices they advocate. They may be unaware of the similarities between certain aspects of positive confession and occultic practices. Nevertheless, the similarities do exist, and these practices are neither Biblical or Christian. John Ankerberg's issue of "News and Views," June 1988, p.1, reports that these words are used in religious rituals to influence both the spirit world and the material world. The report quotes occult magician David Conway discussing the power of magical words to affect these worlds: "Unseparable from magical speculation about words is the theory of vibrations, which supposes that certain sounds have a powerful acoustic impact on both the spiritual and astral worlds... Like the spiritual world and astral plane can in some circumstances be affected by sound, so that verbal magic may be said to derive its power not only from the idea contained in certain words, but from the peculiar vibrations these words create when spoken." ("Magic: an Occult Primer", pp.74-75). Occultists, of course, have long claimed the true inner nature of man is powerful, capable of exercising divine ability. This is why New Ager Benjamin Creme says, for example, "One doesn't pray to oneself, one prays to the God within. The thing is to learn to invoke that energy which is the energy of God. Prayer and worship as we know it today will gradually die out and men will be trained to invoke the (inner) power of deity." ("The Reappearance of Christ and the Masters of Wisdom" pp. 135-136, parenthesis mine) The reason that positive confessionists, like the occultists, can place so much emphasis on the inner man and his divine power is that they think the believer is a god. Kenneth Copeland says, "You don't have a god in you, you are one" (Copeland's sermon tape "The Force of Love"). And Kenneth Hagin says, "The believer is as much an incarnation of God as Jesus Christ." (Hagin, "Word of Faith", p.14). To the positive confessionist, scripture passages such as Proverbs 18: 21, "Death and Life are in the power of the tongue;" and James 3: 8-10 are taken as proof of this doctrine, because they believe as "little gods" they have the same power as God. Is it any wonder that Charles Capps says "The confession of your mouth even after you have prayed correctly will determine whether or not you receive... You can release the ability of God through the words of your mouth." ("Releasing the Ability of God," 1978, pp.93, 96.) For Christians words and faith are important, but there is a limit to what words can do. It can help or hurt a close friend or a total stranger by what one says, but to treat words as if they were some "star wars" type weapon by which one alters or manipulates reality is not biblical, but occultic. If one could change reality by the power of words spoken, then that would put man on the same level with God. This is exactly what teachers of the "positive confession," or word-faith movement, claim. We are told by God Himself that He spoke the creation into existence (Genesis 1). He has not given that power to anyone else! UNDERLYING BELIEFS: GOD To some of the Word of Faith (WOF) leaders, God is a tritheistic being. For instance, Benny Hinn said in a sermon broadcast on TBN on October 13, 1990 that "God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit all have their own spirit body, soul and spirit... if I can shock you and maybe I should, there's nine of them." Teaching that God, who is pure spirit (James 4:24), has His own spirit body is to teach something definitely not found in Scripture. There is no biblical basis for such a teaching. This teaching would be more in line with Mormonism than orthodox Christianity. CREATION Kenneth Copeland teaches that God created the Universe, and everything therein, out of a spiritual substance known as faith, by forming a mental picture of the creation in "the insides of Him," then by using words as containers for His faith, projected the image outwardly into the reality of creation. For example, in his tape, "Spirit, Soul, and Body," Copeland says, "Faith is real... is a power... is a force... It's used by God at His will... This world and everything in it was created by Him and He used His faith to do it... Now you couldn't really and truly say that He created it out of nothing because faith is something... the whole thing was born out of the force of faith that was resident inside the being of God." Copeland's misunderstanding of faith and creation has a New Age ring to it. If the universe was created out of God's faith, and if this faith is the actual life and personality of God, then the creation is merely an extension of God (pantheism or panentheism), thus making all things divine. In his tape, "Following the Faith of Abraham," Copeland asserts, "You don't think God created man in His image and created the earth in some other image, huh? There's nothing under the whole sun that's new. This is a copy of home a copy of the mother planet where God lives, He made a little one just like it and put us on it." Evidently to Copeland, God lives on a big earth just like the smaller one we live on, since everything images the things of God. There is a striking similarity here to Mormonism which teaches that "God is supposed to have lived on a planet near a mysterious star called Kolob" (Bruce McConkie, "Mormon Doctrine," p.428). LITTLE GODS Gloria Copeland, Kenneth Copeland's wife, stated in "The Believer's Voice of Victory," that, "when God breathed the breath of life into Adam, He transmitted His very self into him. God imparted the same spiritual substance of which His is made into Adam's being" ("Believers Voice of Victory," June, 1986, p.10).. In his sermon tape, "Following the Faith of Abraham," Kenneth Copeland teaches that God created Adam a god (having the same attributes as God Himself): "And Adam is as much like God as you can get, just the same as Jesus when He came into the earth... And I want you to know something - Adam in the garden of Eden was God manifested in the flesh." We now see that Brigham Young of Mormonism isn't the only one who has taught the Adam-God theory ("Deseret News," 6/16/1873), but also Kenneth Copeland (parenthesis mine). In "The Force of Love," another sermon tape, Copeland states, "You don't have a god in you, you are one." Kenneth Hagin in "Word of Faith" says, "You are as much the incarnation of God as Jesus Christ was. Every man who has been born again is an incarnation and Christianity is a miracle. The believer is as much an incarnation as was Jesus of Nazareth."("Word of Faith," December 1980, p.14). Earl Paulk of the Harvester Church in Atlanta, Georgia, in his work, "Satan Unmasked" explains it like this: "Adam and Eve were placed in the world as the seed and expression of God. Just as dogs have puppies and cats have kittens, so God has little gods... we have trouble comprehending this truth... Until we comprehend that we are little gods, we cannot manifest the kingdom of God" (p.97). In his book "Agony of Deceit," Michael Horton has documented Kenneth Copeland in a July 19, 1987 crusade as saying, "I say this and repeat it so it don't upset you too bad... When I read in the Bible where He {Jesus} says, I AM, I say, Yes, I am too!" (p.268). In John 8:58, I AM is a self proclamation of Jesus' own unique Deity from Exodus 3:14,15.) Dave Hunt, in his book "Seduction of Christianity," documents Casey Treat, pastor of Seattle's Christian Faith Center, as saying in his tape series "Believing in Yourself" that we're exact duplicates of God. "I'm an exact duplicate of God! When God looks in the mirror He sees me! When I look in the mirror, I see God! Oh, hallelujah!... You know, sometimes people say to me, when they're mad and want to put me down... You just think you're a little god. Thank you! Hallelujah! You got that right! Who'd' you think you are, Jesus? Yep!...Are you listening to me? Are you kids running around here acting like gods? Why not? God told me to!... Since I'm an exact duplicate of God, I'm going to act like God!" One of WOF's proof texts for them being "little gods" is Psalms 82:6. If one looks carefully, it is apparent that God is mocking the judges (gods) who had perverted justice. He {God} says, "I say ye are gods, nevertheless, you will die as mere men" (vss.6 & 7). This is the same proof text the Mormons use to say one can become a god. It is also a contradiction that if one is a god that one should die as a man. God is mocking and in a real sense condemning those that would arrogantly try to lift themselves to such status. As is seen with Casey Treat, another problem with WOF teachers is their misunderstanding of the meaning of man being made in the image of God. To use Treat's own illustration of looking in the mirror, when one does look, what one sees is one's own reflection. The image is not reality. The image is only a reflection of one's reality. One reflects God's image (some of His qualities) but one is not God. Granted that man is in the apex of God's creation and as such is completely different from the rest of creation, but being God's image does not mean that one is a little god. Humans are not divine by nature. God is divine. "Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods". (Galatians 4:8, also see Isaiah 1:6- 11, 43:10, 44:6; Gen.1:26, 28, 3:4-5; Ezekiel 28:2; Psalm 8:6-8.) THE BORN AGAIN JESUS Michael Horton points out in "Agony of Deceit" that "any teaching that denies that Christ as 'the only begotten Son, the One and Only incarnation of God' is heresy" (John 3:16, 1:14,18; I John 4:1). It is important to point this out. Kenneth Copeland, in "Believer's Voice of Victory" in relating to what Christ told him says, "Don't be disturbed when people accuse you of thinking you're God... the more you get to be like me, the more they're going to think that way of you. They crucified me for claiming that I was God. But I didn't claim I was God, I just claimed I walked with Him and that He was in me. (August, 1988, p.8). The early Gnostic heretic, Cerinthus, taught that Jesus was just a man, becoming divine only at Baptism. At the cross, the Holy Spirit left Him, leaving Jesus devoid of His divine nature - once again He was just a man. ("Baker's Dictionary of Theology," Cerinthians, p.113) Copeland seems to advocate the same thing in the same Believer's Voice of Victory, Aug. 1988 issue when he says, "He voluntarily gave up that advantage, living His life here not as God but as a man. He had no innate supernatural powers. He had no ability to perform miracles until after He was anointed by the Holy Spirit as recorded in Luke 3:22." This is needed to understand the WOF's teaching on Jesus' spiritual death. In "God's Will for You," Gloria Copeland states, "Jesus experienced the same spiritual death that entered man in the garden of Eden" (p.3). This can not be so because Adam's death in the garden was due to disobedience where Jesus' death on the cross was due to obedience.(Phil.2: 8b) In "The Name of Jesus," Kenneth Hagin defines spiritual death as "something more than separation from God. Spiritual death also means having Satan's nature... Jesus tasted death - spiritual death - for every man" (p.31). To many in the WOF movement, the emphasis is not on the physical death of Jesus (which is what the Bible emphasizes, i.e., "without shedding of blood is no remission," see Hebrews 9:12, 14, 15, 22) but on the "spiritual death" of Christ. On his tape, "What Happened From the Cross to the Throne," Copeland says, "When {Jesus} said, 'It is finished' He was not speaking of the plan of redemption. The plan of redemption had just begun. There was still three days and three nights to be gone through before He went to the throne" (parenthesis mine). This is in direct opposition to what Christ said on the cross, "It is finished." (John 19:30). The word is "tetelistai" meaning "paid for in full." There was nothing more to pay for beyond the cross. If there was, Jesus would not have said to the thief on the cross, "Today shalt thou be with Me in Paradise" (Luke 23: 43), but instead would have said, "Today you will be with Me in hell."